Author: Hamilton

Special Session Update

Governor Scott Walker and the Republican-controlled Legislature are off to a fast start. In the first month of taking office, the Legislature has actively passed a number of Gov. Walker’s special session bills focusing on job creation.

2011 Wis. Act 2, contains major legal reforms. This landmark legislation was the first piece of legislation to pass both houses.

Special Session AB 8/SB 8 makes a number of important changes to the agency rulemaking process. In general, the new law makes the Governor and the Legislature more accountable for the adoption of regulations and forces agencies to be more transparent about how proposed rules impact regulated businesses.

Wisconsin Act 7 creates a new quasi public Authority called the Wisconsin Economic Development Corporation (WEDC), which essentially represents Phase 1 of the Governor’s plan to completely reorganize the current Department of Commerce. Phase 2 of the Commerce Department reorganization is expected to be presented later this month in the Governor’s biennial budget bill.

Health Savings Accounts: As amended and passed, the bill provides a tax deduction rather than a tax credit of 6.5 percent as contained in the Governor’s original proposal. Under the new law, a person may exclude from his/her personal income tax the amount paid into a health savings account (HAS).

Earnings from HSA contributions, and employer contributions, are also excluded from personal income for state tax purposes. The exclusion first applies to tax years beginning on Jan. 1, 2011. The change puts Wisconsin in line with the tax treatment of HSAs by the federal government and all but three other states.

The bill was signed into law by Governor Walker on January 24th as 2011 Wis. Act 1.

Tax Deduction/Credit for A Business that Relocates in Wisconsin: As amended and passed, the bill creates a tax deduction for business income earned by an individual or pass-through income from a partnership, limited liability corporation (LLC), or tax-option corporation for tax years beginning after December 31, 2010. The deduction may be claimed by a business that moves either 51 percent or more of the workforce payroll or at least $200,000 of paid wages to Wisconsin.

The deduction may be claimed for two consecutive tax years, beginning with the tax year the business begins doing business in Wisconsin. An individual may not take the deduction if the individual or pass-through entity has done business in Wisconsin during the two preceding taxable years.

The bill also creates a similar tax credit for corporations for tax years beginning after December 31, 2010. Partnerships, LLCs, and tax-option corporations are not allowed to claim the credit, but may claim the deduction.

The legislation was signed into law by Governor Walker on January 31st as 2011 Wis. Act 3.

Economic Development Tax Credit Program: The bill increases the maximum total amount of economic development tax credits that could be claimed by $25 million. Coupled with the $73 million in credit cap available under the current program, $98 million in total credits would be available beginning January 1, 2011.

Under the program, individual income or corporate income tax credits may be claimed for conducting a qualified job creation, capital investment, employee training, or corporate headquarters location or retention project.

The legislation was signed into law by Governor Walker on January 31st as 2011 Wis. Act 4.

Supermajority for Passage of Tax Increases: The bill (Special Session AB 5) prohibits the Legislature from passing a bill that would increase the state sales tax or the individual income tax unless approved by a two-thirds majority. The prohibition would not apply if a majority of voters in a statewide advisory referendum approved of the tax increase.

The legislation has passed both houses and is awaiting the Governor’s signature.

The activity during the Special Session over the last several weeks should, as promised, provide substantial tools for economic development and improve Wisconsin’s business climate.

High Court Upholds Tax Assessment Against Eau Claire Company

The Wisconsin Supreme Court this month unanimously affirmed a court of appeals decision denying an appeal of the Department of Revenue’s (DOR) tax assessment for Nestlé’s powdered infant formula plant in Eau Claire.

In Nestlé USA, Inc. v. DOR, 2008AP000322 (Feb. 2, 2011), the question before the Court was the sufficiency of evidence necessary to rebut the presumption of correctness given to DOR’s assessment of the plant.

In 2005, DOR assessed Nestlé’s new powdered infant formula production facility for tax purposes. The DOR attempted to apply the comparable sales assessment method, but could not find any facilities in the United States that had been sold for continued use as powdered infant formula production facilities for comparison.

Other less-specialized food processing plants lacked the FDA-required features of the Nestlé plant, so the DOR determined the highest and best use of the facility was for producing formula.

This meant that in the eyes of the DOR, comparing the facility to other food processing plants would be improper, so a cost approach would be a better assessment. The cost approach estimates the cost of replicating the existing facility, and then deducts value for depreciation, functional obsolescence, and tax-exempt components. Applying the cost approach, the DOR assessed the plant at $10,915,000.

Nestlé appealed the DOR’s assessment, arguing that the cost approach was inappropriate. Nestlé agreed that there was little, if any, market for powdered infant formula facilities; however, Nestlé argued the facility’s highest and best use was as a food processing plant because it could be converted. Nestlé’s assessor used the comparable sales approach, comparing the sales of food processing plants, and appraised the plant at $3,590,000.

Writing for the Court, Justice Michael Gableman affirmed the decisions of the lower courts and the DOR. Under the “substantial evidence” test, the DOR’s assessment is presumed to be correct until “the challenging party presents significant contrary evidence.”

Applying the substantial evidence test, the Court ruled that “Nestlé failed to introduce significant evidence that no market existed for the Gateway Plant’s sale as a powdered infant formula production facility.” Specifically, Nestlé’s evidence that there were no actual formula facilities sold in the United States was not substantial evidence to establish that there is no market.

Governor Walker Signs Tort Reform Legislation Into Law

Today, Governor Scott Walker signed into law the tort reform legislation (see enrolled bill). Here is WisconsinEye’s video coverage of the bill signing ceremony, which includes remarks made by Governor Walker discussing the legislation.

Below are photos of Wisconsin Civil Justice Council members at the bill signing ceremony:

WCJC President and NFIB State Director, Bill G. Smith shaking hands with Governor Walker. Also included in the photo is WCJC Vice President, James Buchen (WMC), and WCJC Board member, Eric Borgerding (Wisconsin Hospital Association).

WCJC Vice President, James Buchen (WMC) with Governor Walker.

WCJC Board member, Ed Lump (Wisconsin Restaurant Association) shaking hands with Governor Walker, along WRA member, Tom Saxe (center).

WCJC lobbyist, Andrew Cook, with Governor Walker:

Assembly Passes Tort Reform Bill – To Be Signed Into Law By Governor Walker

Last night, the Wisconsin Assembly passed Special Session Senate Bill 1, 57-36, along party lines. The bill passed the Assembly just two days after passing the Senate, and will be sent to Governor Scott Walker soon for his signature. The law will go into effect within 10 days after the law is published. The tort reform bill is the first piece of legislation to pass in Governor Walker’s special session on job creation.  (See Milwaukee Journal Sentinel article discussing the legislation.) Continue reading “Assembly Passes Tort Reform Bill – To Be Signed Into Law By Governor Walker”

Wisconsin Senate to Vote on Governor Walker’s Legal Reform Bill

The Wisconsin Senate is scheduled to vote on Special Session Senate Bill 1, relating to civil liability reform, on Tuesday, January 18. The Senate Judiciary Committee on Friday, January 14, voted 3-2 to move the bill to the floor. The bill was amended by the Republicans to address issues raised by opponents of the legislation.

Specifically, the amendment:

  • Removes the retroactive application of the civil liability provisions.
  • Clarifies that the Daubert standards are to be identical to those comparable provisions contained in Federal Rules of Evidence 702.
  • Deletes provisions setting forth new standards for the application of punitive damages and adds a cap to punitive damages of $200,000 or two times compensatory damages, whichever is greater.

WCJC fully supports each of these changes. The Assembly Judiciary Committee is also scheduled to hold an Executive Session on Tuesday to vote the bill out of committee and move it to the full Assembly.

A story about the changes made by the Senate can be read here.

Assembly and Senate Judiciary Committees to Hold Public Hearing on Gov. Walker’s Civil Liability Reforms

The Assembly and Senate Judiciary Committees will hold a joint public hearing next Tuesday on Special Session Assembly Bill 1. Below is the hearing notice. To learn more about the bill, click here.

PUBLIC HEARING

Assembly Committee on Judiciary and Ethics/Senate Judiciary Committee

Tuesday, January 11, 2011
1:00 PM – or upon adjournment of the Senate
GAR Hall –  417 North State Capitol

January 2011 Special Session Assembly Bill 1

Final Disposition of 2009-2010 Legislation

Assembly Bills

Links Summary/Status

AB 938

Colon

History

Trial Bifurcation

Summary: Provides that if a trial court bifurcates a trial with respect to a claim for interest that is allegedly due on insurance proceeds that were not timely paid, all claims must be heard by the same jury.

Status: Introduced April 6, 2010 and referred to the Assembly committee on Judiciary and Ethics; Public hearing held April 20; Failed to pass.

AB 894

Roys

History

Abusive Work Environment

Summary: Would allow an employee to file a civil lawsuit for being subjected to an “abusive work environment.” Would allow an aggrieved employee to seek the following relief: reinstatement, removal of the person who engaged in the abusive conduct giving rise to the unlawful employment practice from the aggrieved employee’s work area, medical expenses, back pay, front pay, compensation for emotional distress, punitive damages, and reasonable costs and attorney fees.

Status: Introduced Mar. 24, 2010 and referred to the Assembly committee on Labor; Public hearing held April 7; Failed to pass.

AB 815

Richards

History

Discovery of Patient Records in Civil Actions

Summary: Makes changes to the scope of, and procedure for, discovery in civil cases where the mental or physical condition of a party is in issue. The court may order the claimant to undergo one physical,mental, or vocational examination, unless the defending party shows good cause for the claimant to undergo more than one examination. A claimant may introduce evidence obtained from the examination or inspection, regardless of whether the defending party seeks to introduce the evidence.

Status: Introduced Mar. 9, 2010 and referred to the Assembly committee on Judiciary and Ethics; Public hearing April 6; Failed to pass.

AB 710

Benedict

History

Condolence by a Health Care Provider

Summary: Provides that a statement, gesture, or conduct of a health care provider that expresses apology, condolence, compassion, benevolence, or sympathy to a patient, patient’s relative, or representative is not admissible into evidence or subject to discovery in any civil action or administrative hearing regarding the health care provider as evidence of liability or as an admission against interest.

Status: Introduced Feb. 9, 2010; Referred to committee on Judiciary and Ethics; Public hearing held Feb. 23. Failed to pass.

AB 480

Berceau

History

 

Civil Cause of Action for Gender Related Violence

Summary: This bill creates a civil cause of action for a person who suffers physical, emotional, or economic harm as a result of a gender−based act. A gender−based act is committed, at least in part, on the basis of the victim’s gender or a physical intrusion that is sexual in nature and under coercive conditions.

A victim must commence a civil action  within seven years after the gender−based act occurs or, if the victim is under the age of 18, within seven years after the victim’s 18th birthday. A victim who prevails may recover damages for emotional distress, punitive damages, and investigation or litigation costs, including attorney fees.

Status: Introduced Oct. 6, 2009; Referred to Committee on Corrections and the Courts. Passage recommended by committee (8-2) Feb. 16, 2010. Passed the Assembly with amendments [AA5 and AA6]. Referred to the Senate committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance reform and Housing on Mar. 8; Passage recommended (4-1) on Mar. 17. Failed to pass.

AB 453

Parisi

History

WCJC Testimony

Statute of Limitations – Sexual Assault of a Child

Summary: Removed the statute of limitation for bringing an action for sexual assault of a child if the victim if over the age of 35.

Status: Introduced Sept. 25, 2009; Referred to Committee on Children and Families. Public hearing held Oct. 21; Voted out of committee (6-2) Oct. 29;

AB 367

Hixson

History

WCJC Testimony

Prohibiting Credit Histories for Employment Purposes

Summary: Prohibits employment discrimination based credit history. The bill provides a narrow exception where circumstances of an individual’s credit history are “substantially related to the circumstances of a particular job or licensed activity” and where the employment “depends on the bondability of the individual and the individual may not be bondable due to his or her credit rating.” Would also allow an applicant to sue an employer that violates the law to seek punitive and compensatory damages of up to $300,000, including actual damages, court costs, and attorney fees.

Status: Introduced Aug. 12, 2009; Referred to Committee on Workforce Development; Public hearing held Aug. 27, 2009. Passage as amended recommended Apr. 16, 2010; Passed the Assembly (49-48). Failed to pass.

AB 354

Roys

History

Statute of Limitations for Intentional Torts

Summary: Increases statute of limitations for intentional torts from two years to three years, similar to statute of limitations for negligence claims.

Status: Introduced on July 28, 2009; Referred to Committee on Judiciary and Ethics; Public hearing held Aug. 25, 2009; Voted  out of Committee on Sept. 9, 2009. Laid on the table Jan. 19, 2010.

AB 291

Richards

History

Medical Malpractice

Summary: Provides that a parent does have the right to recover for loss of society and companionship if the parent’s adult child is injured as the result of medical malpractice.

Status: Introduced June 2, 2009; Referred to Health and Healthcare Reform; Public hearing, July 14, 2009; Passed out of Committee (6-4), Sept. 9, 2009. Failed to pass.

AB 75

Jt. Committee on Fin.

 

State Budget.

Summary: Constitutes the executive budget act of the 2009 legislature.
.

Status: Introduced Feb. 17, 2009; Referred to Joint Finance Committee;These policies buried in the budget will drastically change Wisconsin’s litigation landscape. The entire scheme is designed to allow for more suits, with each suit entangling more so-called ‘deep pockets.”Joint and Several Liability: Anyone with equal or greater fault than the plaintiff can be held 100% responsible (“jointly and severally liable”), even if only 1% at fault. (AB 75, page 1605). Existing law requires a person to be at least 51% at fault before he or she can be held responsible for 100% of damages.

Combined Fault: A person or business that is less at fault than the plaintiff can be sued so long as the “combined” fault of all persons sued is equal or greater than the plaintiff. (AB 75, page 1605). Existing law requires the plaintiff to be less at fault than each defendant he or she is suing.

Jury instructions: The court must inform the jury how the jury’s findings on fault affect responsibility for damages; that is, to allow the jury to adjust fault determinations to maximize awards. (AB 75, page 1588) Existing law limits a jury’s duty to fact finding, consistent with over a hundred-year rule of jurisprudence.

AB 75

Jt. Committee on Fin.

History

Summary: Constitutes the executive budget act of the 2009 legislature.. Status: Introduced Feb. 17, 2009; Referred to Joint Finance Committee;Insurance: Mandates increased limits for auto insurance, requires “stacking,” and expands the “Underinsured Motor Vehicle” definition; also, prohibits reducing clauses, eliminates “hit and run” requirements, and prohibits ‘drive-other-car” provisions.

AB 31

Sinicki

History

Employment Discrimination (Companion to SB 20)

Summary: Authorizes the circuit court to order a person who commits employment discrimination to pay compensatory and punitive damages.

Status: Introduced Feb. 5, 2009; Referred to Labor; Public hearing held Apr. 8, 2009; Passage as amended recommended (5-3) Apr. 23, 2009; Laid on the table Apr. 28, 2009. Companion bill, SB 20, passed and enacted.

AB 23.

Schneider

History

Access to Court Conferences

Summary: Requires that all conferences held by the Supreme Court or court of appeals be open to the public.

Status: Introduced Feb. 5, 2009; Referred to Judiciary and Ethics. Failed to pass.

AB 22

.Schneider

History

Housing Discrimination

Summary: Prohibits discrimination in housing because of an arrest or conviction record that is more than three years old.

Status: Introduced Feb. 5, 2009; Referred to Financial Institutions; Failed to pass.

AB 6 .

Radcliffe

History

Tort Action in Real Estate Transactions (Companion to SB 9)

Summary: Reverses the decision in Below by providing that, in addition to any other remedies that are available, a purchaser in a residential real estate transaction may maintain an action in tort against the seller for intentional misrepresentation.

Status: Introduced Jan. 27, 2009; Referred to Consumer Protection; Public hearing held Feb. 12; Passage recommended (7-2) Feb. 19. Referred to Rules Feb. 27. Failed to pass.

Senate Bills

Links Summary/Status

SB 628

Sullivan

History

Discovery of Patient Records in Civil Actions

Summary: Makes changes to the scope of, and procedure for, discovery in civil cases where the mental or physical condition of a party is in issue. The court may order the claimant to undergo one physical,mental, or vocational examination, unless the defending party shows good cause for the claimant to undergo more than one examination. A claimant may introduce evidence obtained from the examination or inspection, regardless of whether the defending party seeks to introduce the evidence.

Status: Introduced Mar. 18, 2010; Referred to the Senate committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign finance Reform, and Housing; Public hearing held Apr. 8; Failed to pass.

SB 588

Wirch

History

Private Actions for Unsolicited Faxes

Summary: Creates a private cause of action against a person who violates the current limitations on unsolicited facsimile solicitations.

Status: Introduced Mar. 4, 2010 and referred to the Senate committee on Commerce, Utilities, Energy and Rail. Failed to pass.

SB 563

Miller

History

Statute of Limitations for Medical Malpractice

Summary: Extends wrongful death stature of limitations in cases dealing with medical malpractice. Seeks to overturn a recent Wisconsin Supreme Court decision, Estate of Genrich v. OHIC Ins. Co., which held that the time limit for a wrongful death action caused by medical malpractice is counted from the date of the deceased person’s injury instead of the date of death.

Status: Introduced Feb. 26 and referred to committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance reform, and Housing; Public hearing held Apr. 1; Failed to pass.

SB 447

Lassa

History

False Claims

Summary: Allows private parties to file lawsuits on behalf of the state alleging that a person knowingly presented a false claim and deceived the state for the purpose of getting a false claim paid. The private party bringing the lawsuit is eligible to receive 15 to 25 percent of the amount recovered.

Status: Introduced Jan. 7, 2010 and referred to committee on Ethics Reform and Government Operations; Public hearing held Jan. 20; Passage as amended [SA1, SA2] recommended (5-0) Feb. 10; Referred to Joint Finance Feb. 23; Passage recommended as amended [SSA1] by Joint Finance (11-4) Apr. 20; Failed to pass.

SB 337

Coggs

History

Civil Action for Gender-based Act

Summary: Creates a new civil cause of action for a person who suffers physical, emotional, or economic harm as a result of a gender−based act. Imposes a seven-year statute of limitations (most other intentional tort claims must be brought within three years). A plaintiff who prevails in a civil action for a gender−based act may recover damages for emotional distress, punitive damages, and investigation or litigation costs, including attorney fees.

Status: Introduced Oct. 8, 2009 and referred to committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance reform, and Housing. Public hearing held Feb. 18, 2010. Voted out of committee (4-1) as amended by SA2 and SA3 on Mar. 4. Failed to pass.

SB 319

Lassa

History

Statute of Limitations

Summary: Provides a three-year reviver window for plaintiffs to file childhood sexual abuse claims, regardless of the previous expiration of the statute of limitations; eliminates the applicable statute of limitations prospectively.

Status: Introduced Sept. 30, 2009; Referred to committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing; Public hearing Jan. 12, 2010. Failed to pass.

SB 275

Taylor

History

Employment Discrimination

Summary: Allows job applicants and employees to sue employers and seek punitive and compensatory damages if an employer “discriminates” against them based on that person’s credit history.

Status: Introduced Aug. 26,2009 and referred to committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs; Public hearing held Dec. 15; Failed to pass.

SB 218

Erpenbach

History

Violations of Restrictions on Telephone Solicitations

Summary: Increases the penalty for restrictions on telephone solitiations from $100 to a minimum of $1,000 and a maximum penalty of $10,000. The bill also allows a person who suffers damages as the result of another person’s violation to bring an action for injunctive relief and recover $500 for each violation and award the prevailing plaintiff attorney fees.

Status: Introduced May 26, 2009; Public hearing July 22, 2009. Voted out of committee (5-0) Aug. 14; Passed the Senate Sept. 15 and referred to the Assembly committee on Consumer Protection; Public hearing held Nov. 4; Voted out of committee (7-2) as amended[AA1] on Mar. 2, 2010. Passed the Assembly Apr. 22.

SB 203

Plale

History

WCJC Testimony

Medical Malpractice

Summary: Provides that a parent does have the right to recover for loss of society and companionship if the parent’s adult child is injured as the result of medical malpractice.

Status: Introduced May 14, 2009; Referred to Committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing; Public hearing held Aug. 18, 2009. Reported out of committee Sept. 16 (3-2) Sept. 16; Passed the Senate Jan. 19, 2010. Referred to the Assembly. Failed to pass.

SB 196

Lassa

History

Statute of Limitations – Family/Medical Leave Act

Summary: Extends the time limit for filing a complaint under the state family and medical leave law to two years or, if the violation was willful, three years after the event.

Status: Introduced May 7, 2009; Referred to committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing; Failed to pass.

SB 182

Sullivan

History

Intentional Tort Statute of Limitations

Summary: Increases the time limit for bringing an action for intentional tort from two to three years.

Status: Introduced May 4, 2009; Referred to committee on Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing; Public hearing held Aug. 18, 2009. Reported out of committee (5-0) Sept. 16; Passed the Senate Oct. 20; Passed the Assembly (62-32) Jan. 19, 2010; Signed by the Governor as 2009 Wis. Act 120 on Feb. 11, 2010.

SB 20.Hansen

History

Employment Discrimination (Companion to SB 20)

Summary: Authorizes the circuit court to order a person who commits employment discrimination to pay compensatory and punitive damages.

Status: Introduced Jan. 28, 2009; Referred to Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing; Withdrawn and rereferred to committee on Labor, Elections and Urban Affairs Feb. 5; Public hearing held Mar. 12; Passage as amended recommended (3-2) Apr. 14. Passed the Senate (18-15) Apr. 28; Passed the Assembly (51-47) Apr. 29; Signed by the Governor on June 8 as 2009 Wis. Act. 20.

. SB 9

 

Erpenbach

History

Tort Action in Real Estate Transactions (Companion to AB 6)

Summary: Reverses the decision in Below by providing that, in addition to any other remedies that are available, a purchaser in a residential real estate transaction may maintain an action in tort against the seller for intentional misrepresentation.

Status: Introduced Jan. 21, 2009; Referred to Judiciary, Corrections, Insurance, Campaign Finance Reform, and Housing; Public hearing Feb. 5; Passage recommended (5-0) Feb. 11; Passed the Senate Feb. 24; Referred to Assembly committee on Consumer Protection; Withdrawn and referred to committee on Rules Mar. 17; Passed the Assembly (69-28) Mar. 26; Signed by the Governor as 2009 Wis. Act 4 on Apr. 9, 2009.

Federal Court Dismisses Lead Paint Claims Against Manufacturers Based on “Risk Contribution” Theory

A federal district court this week in Milwaukee dismissed claims against defendants named in a lawsuit under the “risk contribution” rule adopted by the Wisconsin Supreme Court in 2005.

In Thomas v. Mallett, 2005 WI 129, 701 N.W.2d 523 (Wis. 2005), the Wisconsin Supreme Court in a 4-2 decision held that the manufacturers of white lead carbonate, which was used as a pigment in paint, were liable for the injuries caused to a child who had ingested paint that contained the white lead carbonate, although the child could not prove that a particular manufacturer produced the white lead carbonate that he ingested. Continue reading “Federal Court Dismisses Lead Paint Claims Against Manufacturers Based on “Risk Contribution” Theory”

Special Committee on Judicial Discipline and Recusal Unveils Proposed Draft Legislation

The Special Committee on Judicial Discipline and Recusal has unveiled its specific proposals dealing with judicial discipline and recusal. The Committee will discuss each item at its next meeting on Thursday, November 18 (10:00 a.m., Room 328 Northwest, State Capitol). It is not clear from the meeting agenda whether the Committee will formally vote to adopt these proposals and recommend them to the Legislature. WCJC will  provide updates as the Committee continues its work.

Below is a synopsis of each the eight draft proposals and a link to the actual language: Continue reading “Special Committee on Judicial Discipline and Recusal Unveils Proposed Draft Legislation”

Wisconsin Law Prohibiting Employers from Meeting with Employees Regarding Unions Preempted by Federal Law

In the waning days of the 2009-10 legislative session, the Wisconsin Legislature enacted SB 585 (2009 WI Act 290), which limited employers’ ability to meet with employees to discuss unions. Specifically, the law amended the Wisconsin Fair Employment Act to prohibit an employer from discharging or otherwise discriminating against an employee, or threatening to discharge an employee, because the employee declines to attend an employer-sponsored meeting.

The Wisconsin Manufacturers & Commerce and Metropolitan Milwaukee Association of Commerce sued the state arguing that the new law is preempted by the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) under the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution.

The state entered into to a stipulation declaring that the NLRA in fact preempts the amended law, thereby enjoining the Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development or any other state agency from enforcing the law.

Click here to view the stipulation entered into by WMC, MMAC and the state.